Change and its Effects

“Change is a weapon whose effects depend on who holds it in his hand and at whom it is aimed” - Anonymous

With that being said, how can we relate that quote to what we are going to talk about in this article?

Well, changing the mode of a well causes changes in temperature and pressure inside and outside the tubing. This can create length and force changes in the tubing string that can potentially affect the packer and downhole tools. Once the packer is installed and the tubing landed, any operational mode change will cause a change in the length or force in the tubing string.

The length and force changes can be considerable and can cause enormous stresses on the tubing string, as well as on the packer under certain conditions. The net result could reduce the effectiveness of the downhole tools and damage the tubing, casing, or even the formations accessible to the well. Failure to consider length and force changes may result in costly failures during the operations.

There are four factors that tend to cause a change in the length or force in the tubing string:

  1. Piston effect: caused by a change in the pressure in the tubing or annulus above the packer on a specific affected area
  2. Ballooning effect: caused by a change in the average pressure inside or outside the tubing string
  3. Buckling effect, caused when internal tubing pressure is higher than the annulus pressure.
  4. Temperature effect: caused by a change in the average temperature of the string

Piston Effect

The length change or force induced by the piston effect is caused by pressure changes inside the annulus and tubing at the packer. It is possible to get rid of the forces generated on the tubing string by the piston effect by anchoring the seals in the packer bore. All the forces are now being absorbed or contained completely within the packer.

Ballooning Effect

The ballooning effect is caused by the change in average pressure inside or outside the tubing string. Internal pressure balloons the tubing and causes it to shorten. Likewise, pressure in the annulus squeezes the tubing, causing it to elongate. This effect is called "reverse ballooning."

Buckling Effects

Tubing strings tend to buckle only when the internal tubing pressure (pi) is greater than the annulus pressure. The result is always a shortening of the tubing string, but the actual force exerted is negligible. The diminishing in length occurs because of the tubing string being in a spiral shape rather than straight.

Temperature Effect

Thermal expansion or contraction causes the major length change in the tubing. Heated metal expands, and cooled metal contracts. In a long string of tubing with a temperature change over its entire length, if tubing movement is constrained, forces will be introduced as a result of the temperature change.

The direction of the length change for each effect must be considered when summing them. It follows that for a change in the conditions; the movement created by one effect can be offset or enhanced by the movement developed by another effect.

For these scenarios, PVI has developed TMPRO.

TMPRO-tubing movement | PVI drilling software

Among its many features it includes:

  • 3 packer types (free, limited and anchored)
  • Piston, buckling, ballooning and temperature effects
  • Pipe database
  • Different tubing materials
  • Initial and final fluid configurations
  • Tensile and stress strengths
  • Burst and collapse strengths
  • Operation designs

TMPRO is based on the theory developed by Lubinski and Hammerlindi and it’s a great tool to avoid any tubing or packer problems allowing its users to make the right change to have the right effects.

Casing Centralizer Series – 5: Are We Using Too Many or Too Few?

Our industry is blessed with many talented and experienced engineers. We also have centralizer vendors producing the very best and top quality products. It is critical that we maximize the engineering potential while selecting the proper types of centralizers and placements. A software package like CentraDesign should be an integral part of the total approach of the centralizer placement optimization.

Theories and equations determining the casing deflection between centralizers are well established, even though a hand calculation for a deviated well is impractical.

Experience plus software technology enable both centralizer vendors and operators to conduct centralizer optimization prior to field execution.

Fig. 1. Total Approach of Centralizer Placement

Fig. 1. Total Approach of Centralizer Placement

When optimizing the centralizer placement, consider the following:

  • Each well is different. Our previous experience may not apply to the next well.
  • Operators aim to obtain a satisfactory standoff with less centralizers.
  • Similarly centralizer vendors aim to obtain a satisfactory standoff to sell more units.
  • Software like CentraDesign optimizes the centralizer placement and usage.
  • Computer modeling reduces risks and costs.

Centralizer placement can make or break a good cementing job. Computer modeling is not only an easy but also a necessary step to achieve optimization of centralizer usage.  So, if you ask me the question: “Are we using too many or too few centralizers?” I would say: “If we all use readily available software to check the standoff profile for a specified spacing and optimize the placement, then we would probably use the correct number of centralizers.”